The blog has moved. Just browse to www.dearmrlevy.com

1882

the fighting cock podcast
blog best viewed on

Firefox, Safari, Chrome and IE8+.

Powered by Squarespace
« NLD journal #3 | Main | NLD journal #2 »
Friday
Nov192010

N17: Home is where the heart is

There's been plenty of debate and opinion in the past few days, spurned on in addition by David Lammy (Tottenham MP) who revealed via Twitter that Daniel Levy is serious about the Stratford bid. Well he's hardly not going to be serious is he? Of course he's serious. Levy is a business man and his responsibility is to THFC, unequivocally and unquestionable. Although the health and financial clout of ENIC is also of utmost importance. A new stadium would equate to our overall value quadrupling and some. It's about revenue and we have a power-house of a fan base, just not enough seats at the minute.

We all know this redevelopment and approval lark has dragged on and on, even though the reality is - it's just been going through the standard application process. Seems like we're all now tap dancing around the last hurdle. A substantial amount of work has gone into the vision and re-designs of the Northumberland Redevelopment Project. The question marks have always been about the transport links and traffic issues getting in and out of N17. Which is apparently one reason why moving to Stratford is a viable option. No more walking up Tottenham High Road rushing for the bus. Or leaving the game ten minutes early (that's for all the West Standers amongst you) and missing a late <insert promoted side here> winner.

Okay, so there are countless facets to this for and against argument. And plenty has been said already (mostly from the three stooges over in Green Street) about how we would not be allowed to uproot and move from one Borough to another (hey, if we did, we'd be so close to them lot they'll have a right to call us their rivals and it would mean something…derby matches against Orient would be guaranteed sell-outs. If they ever got themselves into the Prem that is).

I've even heard that Boris himself (a week or so away from announcing his approval/disapproval of the Northumberland project) invited Spurs to bid for Stratford. Supposedly because we would be far more beneficial to the area and the Olympic stadium in terms of fan base, money and stature. Sub-plots about running tracks and concerts don't sit well with me. But if there is no running track and the stadium could be touched up to include even more seats etc etc - financially, it would be the easier option to take/be given. Purely from the perspective of progression and cost. If we're talking about the club as a business entity. Far fewer headaches and possibly far more accommodating politically.

Haringey are tiresome and draining and it would seem not fully appreciative that without the club all they would have left in Tottenham is that quite wonderful kebab house just past the Paxton Rd and on the opposite side of the high road where they wrap up your chips in pita bread. Probably not worth a visit every other week if there's no dessert to feast on just after 3pm. However, they've approved the plans regardless.

Back to Levy. At the time that Spurs officially bid (confirmed their interest) in the Olympic Stadium, I was advised this was astute and shrewd of Mr Chairman. Covering all bases. Think about it. We have plans to knock down and build a brand spanking new stadium just to the side of WHL. It would aid in the regeneration of the surrounding area. The local council know this. All the reports and surveys and various must haves (i.e. the listed buildings) are simply standard hurdles. The final one is where Boris now stands, but he wont be the one jumping, just rubber-stamping. All the tap dancing being had is by us, the press, West Ham, MP's and journalists.

Levy had to declare interest in Stratford because if the NRP was rejected, we'd be stuck with our 36,000 capacity. We might still be stuck in Tottenham if there's an uproar and riots back in East London, a few miles from the border into the North. Sullivan with staff screaming, you shall not pass. The Lilywhite Balrog defeated. Karren Brady at the time made a big deal of Levy not telling her about it, presumably via Facebook. She misses the point like many. It's not about her or her poxy little club or anybody outside of THFC. It's about Tottenham Hotspur. And I applaud Levy for his tunnelled focus on making sure that whatever happens no rock is left unturned. Because the risk of ending up with nothing would be a disaster.

Levy, at his Machiavellian best you might say, could have initially used Stratford to pressure Haringey. But its gone to the Mayor so there is very little to be gained from political blackmail and at the end of the day, if there existed a third option he'd have probably gone after that with equalled motivation. Boris might do what's best for London or he might just opt to give us what we want. Levy is continuing on both fronts because he would be wholly unprofessional if he didn't. One thing is for certain, unlike us - he's not split in the middle. Levy knows what is best - from his perspective - for the club. Deep down. Everything he does, we question and attempt to second guess and decipher. Patience, not much of a virtue.

This is where it gets fragmented. If you had to guess, which way would you go?

What side of the fence do you sit on?

On the one hand you could argue that Tottenham, it's essence, is the fans. We are the club. We get charged up to £50 - £70 per game for the privilege, but it's still all about us (although modern football is making the majority more and more disposable and replaceable with each passing decade). Some clubs, if they upped and moved  would not need to offer cut-price tickets to re-generate a buzz. Although there still remains a risk of a curse not too dissimilar to the one Man City fans find themselves in.

We're the heart of the club. No matter where we are you could argue we would perceiver and make the most of it. If we moved away from N17, the club and its traditions would move with us. Sentimental, romantic notions of 'our patch' and the Glory Glory nights under the floodlights at the Lane - will remain strong in our history, and never be forgotten. We still lose WHL if we rebuild just next to it. So what difference moving a few miles away? It's not like we're moving from South London to North London? We'll just be moving the THFC franchise a few miles up the road. No need for a breakaway club. No change of name. Agree? Disagree? FC Hotspur of Tottenham anyone?

So up the road. To the Gardens of Babylon of East London. So what of the area?

Quite a number of European clubs have their grounds in not so glamorous surroundings. I guess moving from Tottenham to Stratford wouldn't make that much of a difference either way. Although Stratford will have some trees so obviously it's going to be prettier. I lived for some time in Leyton, stones throw from Stratford. Anyone know this part of the world? Allow me to describe it to you. There is a tradition for local residents to throw their broken tv sets and old and stained bed mattresses outside in the street. In fact, any old rubbish, just dump it outside because someone will pick it up.

Gang warfare from teenagers with knives to the East Europeans, muggings, killings, drunken fights in the streets, pockets of poverty and run down buildings aplenty. A lack of respect. It's a bit like moving from Basrah to Baghdad. Or say, I don't know, from Tottenham to Stratford. Hmm.

People from that part of the world might think I'm being harsh, but I'm just picking up on the bad things that outweigh the good. Much like you would for N17. Both, personally, from the perspective of living there, are hardly paragons of beauty to look at. But then in regards to Spurs, the high road is something you walk down to get to the ground. It's not the reason for going to Tottenham. WHL is.

It's all fairly redundant. Most parts of London are rundown, unless we decided to build a stadium in the middle of Knightsbridge.

So who gives a f*ck where the stadium sits when all that matters is what goes on inside it?

We are Tottenham. That's all that matters. Right?

If Spurs and Levy genuinely believe we will be paralysed in parts with the transport aspect (would cost billions to extend the Victoria Line) of staying in N17 (the only negative long term issue worthy of discussion, well that and the 'just under 60,000 capacity')  then I'll have to suck it up. Spurs will be around long after I'm gone. But as colourful as all the rhetoric is from all corners and taking in all the pros and cons of going or staying - I'm going to go with my heart. Because that's how I follow football. Gut feelings.

I will be shocked and surprised if Boris doesn't give the green light.
I will be shocked and surprised if Levy's vision, his priority, is not to stay in North London.
I will be shocked and surprised if the whole progress and process of submitting and re-designing the Northumberland Redevelopment Project that came with the hardly unsurprising initial rejections and demands of change has forced Levy into changing his focus from North to East Northish East London.
I will be shocked and surprised if after all this, Levy always knew that the cost of building a stadium in N17 would have a detrimental effect on the club in terms of transfers in and out long term and that the real ruse was the project and thus the real target was Stratford.

We could be here all day drowning deep in conspiracy theories and agendas (is Lammy tweeting for his own personal gains to look good or is he being played by Levy or are they both in on it? See what I mean?)

My heart says we don't want to move and there is very little chance of Boris rejecting it and that the fact its got as far as being sent to his office for final approval means that its practically done and dusted. IMO.

Tottenham Hotspur, the experience, it's match-day traditions and its soul is in the heart of N17, Tottenham. It's home. Even with the police signs calling for witnesses littering the high road and the distinct lack of pretty buildings. It's home. The pubs and the long walk down from Seven Sisters. The ridiculous queues to get a train from White Hart Lane station into Liverpool Street post-match. None of it actually matters. And yet it does. But then who cares as long as Spurs win?

It's our territory. It's our land. Just for one or two days every couple of weeks.

Sentimental, I guess I am after all. Stratford would feel like an away day, detached from the past. For a while perhaps. And having just under 60,000 in N17 would make the various queues even longer. But personally, I'd rather have the atmosphere of having the majestic swashbuckle of our club in a derelict area than moving outside of the place we are named after into the heartland of Orient and West Ham United.

A derelict area with a shiny new polished stadia in the middle of it.

If I lack ambition or perhaps allowing sentimentality to cloud my judgement, sorry. My heart rules. If Levy or you think otherwise then so be it.

And I guess my heart is also telling me I'm a traditionalist. If it was good enough for Bill Nicholson to live up the road from, then its good enough for me to travel to from my humble village dwellings just outside the M25 in Essex. To be honest I still have issues with losing White Hart Lane (the ground and it's name), so the sucking up I'll have to do to deal with a move to Stratford would have to take on epic proportions for me to accept it. But accept I'll have to. Sir Bill would not have wanted the club to stand still. Aim high.

It's about revenue. But foremost, in its purist form, it's about football. It should be. And it should be about us. The fans. The 'club'. So what do you want?

If we're progressing as a football club will it matter where the new chapter is being written?

I guess the crux of it is, either way, whatever happens, no matter which side of the fence you sit - no matter the final decision - you will move on. No matter the loyalties sacrificed. We'll move on. Together. With the club. As one.



 

Reader Comments (175)

There's very much a do or die shake down going on with all this.

Cant say the situation is that desperate.

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:20 PM | Registered Commenterspooky

WNTNBWNTSBWTTWHL ...................

So go on....... how? How do regenerate ........


and regeneration!!!!! look it up mate........and then lets talk about stagnation shall we........

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:25 PM | Unregistered CommenterWisky Tom

By applying the pressure that Levy is in his statement today!

I'm not suugesting that we stay at the Lane to the deteriment of moving forward as a club but we shld ensure every possiblity is thoroughly explored before contemplating moving.

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:29 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

Conflicted

Of course I want to stay at the Lane - To see us grow into a 60,000 seater would be fcuking amazing - but it ain't going to happen - let's face it! So.....rather than sit there and implode, I vote we have faith and back Levy

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterWisky Tom

Maybe so Spooky, but I believe it will also be the defining legacy of Levy and ENIC's ownership of the club.

Whatever happens on the pitch they will always be known for the choice they make regarding the stadium. As fans of the club, we have to embrace the words of Levy and focus our attentions on ensuring the public bodies that are involved do their bit to keep Spurs where they belong. If that means them pumping cold hard cash into the project, then so be it. If they truly care about the local area then they will keep Spurs in N17 as it will be as good an investment of public money in Tottenham as could be. Without it, the area would lose its identity as much as the club.

I may be overly sentimental but as lifelong fan and resident of N17 I'm ruled exclusively by my heart. My current pre match ritual would be in tatters!

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterPark Lane Dan

Whisky Tom

Well let's see how things play out then rather than get into slagging matches with fellow Spurs fans!

Nothing is a given yet and I'm sure the availablility of public funds is not a dead issue.

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

Levy is playing hardball, I agree.

Nov 19, 2010 at 7:57 PM | Unregistered CommenterJep

He's bringing out the violins....just need to get the local kids involved...along with a few stories about how deprived the local schools are, the lack of facilities for locals etc..

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:01 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

Off the back of Levy saying the club will once more talk the fans, did the fans not say first time round we don't want to move from N17? Someone on Facebook just said that a massive percentage of fans live within a mile of the ground (not sure how on the ball that is statistically - edit: 85% live further than a mile not within, thought it that didn't sound right). Regardless, if the fans don't want a move it will still come down to custodian Levy to make the decision.

I'm in turmoil at the minute, swaying from one side to the other in terms of my prediction that we would be granted our application to build on N17.

I'm going to stick with it.

Levy *is* playing hard ball. It's textbook genius.

Also - I'm going to speak to someone, not connected with the club, but experienced with the whole process who might be able to tell me his opinion in terms of whether he smells a bluff aimed at the council or a not so subtle hint to the fans that we need to get ready to say goodbye.

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:03 PM | Registered Commenterspooky

http://www.davidlammy.co.uk/David_Lammy_responds_to_Tottenham_Hotspur_statemen

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM | Registered Commenterspooky

With Levy it cld be either...master bluffer!

I think their needs to be more of a concerted effort from local people as to why a regeneration project wld be a huge benefit to the local community...maybe playing up that angle wld increase the likelhood of funds being made available.

Its not as if Tottenham doesn't look like the Land Time Forgot!

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

Also, let me just say as an Amurrikin Yid, we can still care (a lot, actually) about these decisions, even if we've only ever lived an ocean's distance from N17.

And FWIW, I think moving out of Tottenham is a terrible idea. Will it be the death of Tottenham Hotspur? No. But until I'm forced either to have to accept it or to quit loving Spurs (yeah right), I'm going to stick with "it's a terrible idea."

Finally, what's with all the intra-Yid hatred? Shouldn't the imminence of the NLD at least remind everyone that we're all in this together?

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:10 PM | Unregistered CommenterAnonsters

Also, just read Lammy's statement. That's kind of a weak response. Bleh. Need to do better than that, son.

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:12 PM | Unregistered CommenterAnonsters

Why have we only heard from Lammy publically now.........he needs to up his game livo!

He'd be a hero if he cld help contribute positively to the area's regeneration (which I'm sure he has done in the past on a smaller scale).....even though I'm sure as an MP he probably thinks he's a living leg-end already!

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:31 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

People talking about the club as a 'brand' - FUCK OFF!

Can someone please restore some sanity around here?

NO! NO! NO! to Stratford.

The Stratfordites ought to hang their heads in shame.

A move to Stratford will completely ruin THFC or whatever the fuck they'll have to call it. Nothing has been decided yet, yet it's already proving divisive.

This MUST NOT be allowed to happen.

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterTMWNN

The more time I spend thinking about this, the less I'd accept a move to East London.

There has to be another way if the NRP gets rejected or Levy doesn't push ahead with it.

Nov 19, 2010 at 8:56 PM | Registered Commenterspooky

It does become less palatable the more u think about it!

As u said before Spooky 1st priority has to be the existing site, only in the absence of public funds or the costs becoming too prohibitive shld alternatives come into play. Even then I wld want to see alternatives closer to our traditional area, not that I'm completely against the Olympic Site seeing as it does seem to add up (in a financial sense)!

Nov 19, 2010 at 9:10 PM | Unregistered CommenterConflicted

I think Levy is forcing them to cough up the funds. Late in the day but its the right way to play it.

Nov 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM | Unregistered CommenterEmailFemale

The one good point Lammy made in an otherwise unexceptional response, which in my view he should've emphasized right from the start and should make loud and absolutely clear, is the financial condition of Haringey itself. If 1/5 people are being laid off ("being made redundant" is one of the more unfortunate of your Britishisms), it's not exactly kosher [see what I did there?] for Levy to demand that Haringey fork over public money to help finance the project. I mean, you can certainly debate short-term budgetary priorities versus long-term growth potential, but that's still asking a political body to make a decision that political bodies will never make. I don't know the details of how London is governed, so I don't know what other options Levy has for securing some public financing from anyone other than Haringey. Anyone who does know have anything to enlighten us with?

Nov 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM | Unregistered CommenterAnonsters

I love the anticipation once I arrive at seven sisters, all those memories and feelings up the high road and into the ground. How shit would it be to turn up somewhere in east london, not have a clue where you are or where to drink yet it is meant to be home. Tottenham is a hole, but it is somehow part of us, cant see stratford having the same emotional pull.

Nov 19, 2010 at 11:50 PM | Unregistered Commenterbonio

Hey YankYid

So...
.
..."If 1/5 people are being laid off ("being made redundant" is one of the more unfortunate of your Britishisms)" jars against your ear. Surely they are merely being "let go"... far more acceptable, ain't it.

Take the point about Yid vituperating versus Yid. Sad, innit?? Especially as all of 'em sound a little ESN!

COYMFS

Nov 20, 2010 at 9:50 AM | Unregistered Commenterczyrko

what levy has shown in the club statement is the lack of investment in N17 .....for many years...... working with the massive local business of thfc and its fans on match day etc........to have no public funding support? is a farce compared to other examples plus pressure from E heritage (who themselves have not invested in the same buildings in question) on a few dodgy dilapdated buildings indicate how the layers of power shoot a great business venture down with their own interests being served only .....so spurs/enic have to pay for infrastructure change without assisted public funding really is a disgrace to haringey compared to the emirates and wembley......(is the new ground not going to be a part of the world cup bid.for london.stadium)......levy is smart......and has our club financial stability and asset build as paramount in regards to loss of monies ......,with the attitude he has to deal with.........N17 needs regeneration funding in a constructive win/winmodern way ...keeping its prize asset and local shops in business etc . in the borough........so its a chess game........and the piece which has put the council in check..........is stratford........crass selfishness and lack of vision from the politic and an institutionalised english heritage behaving as if they are higher than anyone with disregard to the project to the local need in real financial terms.............this is a chance for the council to make good many years of neglect......looks like they have blown it

Nov 20, 2010 at 10:22 AM | Unregistered Commenterbilliospur

TMWNN

What a joke you are........ 'SAY NO NO NO TO STRATFORD' 'FUCK OFF' Are you wiping shite all over your living room walls in protest too?

Grow up......Oh and hey..........the World isn't flat after all!

Nov 20, 2010 at 10:39 AM | Unregistered CommenterWisky Tom

"If the club are serious about remaining in Tottenham, they need to make urgent representations to the Mayor of London and the London Development Agencies about the need for public monies to fund this urgent regeneration and development."

Could our local parlimentary representatives not also make such representations to the Mayor of London and the London Development Agencies about the need for public monies to fund this urgent regeneration and development? I thought that was their job!!

Nov 20, 2010 at 11:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterJohnnyB

id like to say we are ALL spurs fans with mixed thoughts on change as shown by the opposing comments on this great blog and debate.....regarding the new stadium......its our money which supports the club and so its current local interests and borough should be lobbying to add real financial support to our ...the peoples interest as our money has given local business support for decades ....no one including levy wants to lose the big heart and association ,identity etc we have and memories......this is a pivotal point for the club......in the end we must make the right call.....unfortunately Lammy MP (pratt )has behaved in a juvenile way on tweetering etc on such an important decision process a publicly bad use of his position...indicating the stupidity of persuasion levy is dealing with........there is the thought in my mind that the stratford ground would reinvent THFC in a way which would dominate the london skyline of sport ..........for a very long time.......but if the fans have to move to potentially the best stadium in london...... the feelings of loyalty to the hole known as N17 are natural........in a way everyone is right........will they serve pies?.......maybe they should retain white hart lane and make it a sister ground for the ladies tottenham or something associated with the club to retain its heritage?

Nov 20, 2010 at 11:10 AM | Unregistered Commenterbilliospur

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>