The blog has moved. Just browse to www.dearmrlevy.com

1882

the fighting cock podcast
blog best viewed on

Firefox, Safari, Chrome and IE8+.

Powered by Squarespace

Entries from October 1, 2011 - October 31, 2011

Wednesday
Oct122011

What is Tottenham Hotspur?

Just when I thought I was out...they pull me back in. This Stratford saga is never ending.

I posted the below over in the thread 'The East End itch Levy can't quite scratch...' at The Fighting Cock forum. I've made some amends to it for this blog. Promised myself I wouldn't got back to discussing this, but then it's one of those subjects that fragments us (an already fragmented fanbase).

Be sure to join in the discussion.

 

What is Tottenham Hotspur?

Its difficult to talk about this question because you can sit and attempt to quantify what constitutes emotional detachment and what defines a club and what it means in practicality for hours and still not get anywhere when attempting to use said arguments in relation to a potential move away from N17.

So what is Tottenham? Is it the fans? The area? Do you define a club by its traditions and if so, what are traditions? Style of play, memories of games? Players? Celebrations? Infamous away trips? Hatred for other clubs? The Lane? The journey into the Lane? So much goes into constructing the DNA of a supporter and club. I think its all of the above, all mashed together in a sexy gooey kinda way.

Football is emotive, so surely it should be based on emotions?

What? Oh yeah, PLC. I need to remember to get a tattoo of that on my back.

If we moved down the road, say to another part of North London, there would be a transitional period for all of us attempting to move on from the fact we've left WHL. It happens in life when you leave a job, split up with your partner or someone dies. You think its all gone and it wont be the same again, its all changed, but you adapt and you end up embracing the present and look towards the future.

No matter where we play, you could argue, Spurs exist because they exist in our heads and in our minds. If there were no Spurs fans they'd be no club. Now before I drown in deeply philosophical musings that I'm struggling to articulate because I'm sober...what I'm saying is, I do get that history DOES count and everything this club has achieved will not suddenly disappear because we've shifted home.

Or will it? Will people look back on it with some degree of detachment? Will it matter if that happens when I hit the grand old age of 70 and new young football fans don't much care for whatever happened back in the days of HD and 3D tv, what with their 'Watch the game with retina-cam' via your fav player with Holographic TV™.

I wasn't alive in the 1960s yet that side, those players, they feel and belong to me as much as any player or team I have watched in the modern era.

Spurs won the double in 61. Eight FA Cups. Trophies in Europe. I could name 50 flair players off the top of my head that made their mark for our club. These are the things we can't lose because what has happened can never be changed, but the clubs actual physical persona, its character and its appearance will forever morph into something completely different. And why? Because at that (this) moment in time Stratford was more affordable and feasible than N17.

Revenue, 60K + attendances, new supporters, corporate hospitality to die for, transport links made in heaven...all this has nothing to do with what happens on the pitch when Spurs play. I'm talking in the purest sense here. If it takes another 10 years to get the NDP sorted I'd rather wait then spend another 100 years in N17 than to uproot and move to another part of London just because it's a more fiscal do-able option in the short term.

I get its a business. I get shareholders and investment. But that doesn't mean I should conform. Tottenham (like many clubs) have copyrighted everything to do with the club. Brand. Tottenham the brand. You want use the THFC club badge on your blog because you're a fan? Sorry, no chance. Pay Spurs first for the privilege. Or be sued. Why? Because you can't be making money off the Tottenham brand. That's modern football. If I'm in the minority that wish to hold onto the last surviving romantic notions, then so be it.

Why the mad rush and the opportunistic short cut with the OS bid? Football might well implode in the next 10 years, we don't know. The mad rush is because of those shareholders and their demand for it. They invested money. You can't argue against their argument. But again, why should that concern me?

I guess football has moved on and I'm refusing to move with it.

Billionaires are buying up clubs left right and centre and changing the competition and the landscape of competitiveness. Again, I'd rather be this plucky team on the outside punching our way in. And if we get in, and we enjoy a cycle of success and then lose that cycle. So be it. That's football. Not everyone has that honour of silverware. Nobody is at the top forever. We've not quite been at the top for a long long time. I'd welcome it. Would even be acceptable in small doses.

So it all comes back to what you define as heritage and would constitutes an acceptable sacrifice (i.e. leaving North London to settle in East London) to consolidate progression and that competitive spirit in this age of money.

The club would have moved had they won the bid. That's the scary thing. The power of our custodians over the voice of the dispensable fan all too evident.

We are Tottenham, a small club they say, yet we always compete or at least show ambition to and the last 15 years or so (the barren 90s) has been down to bad management on the pitch (and off) in terms of managerial appointments. We still make money, we still splash said money. And look at us now, with the monopoly practically dead, we are always in with a chance. It's exciting. Let's not forget its all the depression that makes the good times good.

We need a bigger ground, not because I'm concerned about the £££ but because we have loyal hardcore fans who want season tickets and they are much needed because 50k will make more noise than 37K. The extra revenue will obviously help to bolster the rich and spoilt millionaires that wear the shirt with a fraction of the loyalty we possess. That's the hit right there.

I probably still haven't got my point across in the best way, but I guess what I want, what I need as a fan is different to how others might perceive things. Some are simply focused on the fact that a bigger stadium will equate to more money that will somehow guarantee success and glory. Might. Might not. It's a risk either way. Would prefer to retain our identity. I do agree we need to be ambitious. But want us to anchor ourselves to some of that emotive stuff that glues as together. That's the identity with all the romantic caveats attached.

You know, from my front door, Stratford is thirty minutes away by tube (and I don't even live in London). But I'd still rather spend 1 hour + getting into that sh*t hole in North London.

That's just me.

 

Tuesday
Oct112011

In a East End town, a dead end world

So on the one hand you might agree that Levy's legal sniping has pushed West Ham United, the OPLC, UK Athletics and the Government all into a corner with Boris serving up cups of tea in panic discussing issues raised. Issues pertaining to fairness and the running track which concludes with the break down of the Brady bunch owning the OS out right. But there was no panic. More of a swift counter-move on a dirty chess board that needs binning.

Instead they'll (probably) get a 125 lease (as good as owning it), except its not as good as owning it in terms of potential corporate profit you'd make if you did, to name just one reason. The running track is supposedly now cast in stone to remain. Or is it? I'm sure over time it will disappear. They will find a reason (or add it to the small print of the new bid) and validate it and let's be honest, few will care. By that point, the NDP will be in full swing and Levy will be past bothering himself with further court room dramatics. Anyone who moves into the OS and retains its current structure is asking for trouble either way. No atmosphere with running track, no atmosphere without it. Its an athletics stadium, its not purpose built for football. If its leased, what chance of a complete overhaul of its structure? Unlikely.

Not sure anyone has 'won the day'. Look at the money spent in the original bidding process. There has been plenty of manoeuvring and posturing and politics. But little has changed. They always wanted WH to 'win' the OS. They used Tottenham to consolidate the bid but the fallout now means they just have to swagger on in as tenants.

Levy's legal push is now redundant so perhaps they have won after all. They've defused all the bad publicity. They can now agree a new proposal that we (Levy) can hardly object too. It was of course the original process we had issues with. Still, as someone pointed out to me, WH can hardly dump debt as an asset onto a stadium they do not have ownership of. Affordable as tenants, but not in the long term.

At least the media cant be arsed to prolong this tiresome saga by suggesting we might want to pay rent in East London. We'll have to wait to see what all the official statements detail.

The most prominent THFC question, in terms of Machiavellian tactics, is whether Levy still retains any cards to bolster the redevelopment in N17. The concern is, he might still wish to bite back. This is Levy. Shrewd, hard as rock. We still await to see whether the fight for admission on the original process is now dead.

End game in sight, right?

Or perhaps not. Read this article by Martin Cloake. There are still plenty of questions that require answering, relating to accountability.

We can all agree (no matter Lilywhite or Claret and Blue) that this has been an absolute mess.

 

Monday
Oct102011

International break killed the Tottenham blogger

International break is the bane of blogging. I usually take the opportunity to write without the anchored constraints of what is expected during a busy build up to a Spurs match. But alas, could not even inspire myself to muster up something (anything) to drown out the snoring that accompanies another England match. The North London derby seems a world away now, so far in fact, I almost expect to trip over a Betamax copy of the 2-1 win whilst searching for the remote control. Has anything of note happened in the past week?

Paul Gascoigne opened his heart for the Guardian. Harry Redknapp cited Cahill and how we are still interested in signing him. Some no mark made a joke about Spurs playing like girls. What like Arsenal's silverware hauling ladies team? I don't get the joke. But I do get that his team choke more often than a casting couch starlet. No laughing matter on the pitch, no laughing matter off it, it seems for anyone in red and white these days.

So to answer my own question, no. Not a lot has happened in the past week. I'd recommend that Gazza interview. I idolised Gascoigne back in the day, even when he wore the black and white of the Toon. They don't quite make them like that these days. Robust, cheeky and brilliant. Mackayesque (with smiles) no head screwed on with an additional destructive personality. The lack of head being screwed on and his personal issues his downfall off the pitch and arguably on it, although injury plight punctured his form. He still entertained, he still carved out moments of sheer magic. Clown prince of football he was called once upon a time back when it was pranks aplenty in amongst the powerful driving genius of his play. Tragedy aside, he's the type of player that would rekindle my love for internationals. Instead we have Theo and Jack. Sad face. I love you Paul and I miss your ilk.

As for England (might as well), we drew 2-2 and we qualified and I still don't seem to give a **** about it. Rooney gets sent off and there's discussion on how we plan to cope with his suspension. Does it matter if he plays or not? We never seem to do well either way. This disenchantment I have for the national side, I wish I hadn't. Maybe when the old guard are finally gone I can push on rediscovering my love for the Three Lions. Then again, if Redknapp takes over...well, that wouldn't be too bad. If anything, just to see how the media treat him in comparison to his red carpet VIP currently. Elsewhere, Bale scored for Wales and Rafa played 78 minutes for the Netherlands. The latter a minor miracle.

At least now we can start looking forward to Newcastle away. We never seem to get much up there. We seem to get bossed and for a long time it was a guaranteed defeat in the league. Okay, so they're in form and unbeaten but perhaps punching above their weight akin? Pound for pound, we should be able to contain them and beat them. Should. Sandro and Parker in the middle, Modric free to dink and dictate...we need to be looking at the three points. More on that later in the week when it's clearer who will be available for selection.

In the mean time, check out The Fighting Cock website and register for the forum. If you've not heard the podcast before, then listen to episode 11 for some NLD glory. We're not recording this week. Blame international break.

 

Tuesday
Oct042011

Their empire of dust needs to be swept under the carpet

There is no doubting that we need to finish above Arsenal to truly crow about the shift in power under the brooding North London sky. But you need to be insane (or own a red and white shirt) to disagree that one cycle is coming to its end and another continues to blossom.

One of the finest testaments to the Redknapp era at Spurs is the fact that in recent years we have the better record over our old enemy. In head to heads, we tend to best them. The fear, the crippling self-doubt...doesn’t exist any more. For too many years we lacked the quality and the authority to stamp Lilywhite across the NLD and sheer plucky effort was never enough as we were brushed aside time and time again. The dominance of the monopoly crumbled and everyone up top degraded a little. Arsenal have gone from super human to mere mortals whilst we have anchored ourselves to the upper tier without yet consolidating, but with every chance of doing so.

Wenger and his sorry lot are akin to Superman when he agrees to sacrifice his powers. Except you can’t see them getting their powers back (unlike in the movie), what with Arsene building a Fortress of Solitude out of Kryptonite. They’ve lost their best players. They tend to lose their best players almost by default these days. You expect them to replace the lost souls with new Gods but they dither and end up with decent players but of the ilk you expect seasoned top eight sides to sign. It’s a sign of the times, they’re in transition and they are struggling to adapt to morality. They look beatable. They look like they have mistakes and lapses of concentration in them all the time.

This is not an obituary. They still possess quality, but in a twisted way they are more alike to us in terms of how we shaped up a few seasons back. Couple of star players in amongst the ordinary, fancy football flattering to deceive. They show glimpses of belief and desire but it's almost at the expense of really having to push for it, rather than oozing with ease.

Our 2-1 win more or less paints the same picture as described above. Reactions from their support further illustrating how different things truly are at this moment in time. Did Arsenal play well at the Lane? Apparently so. They nicked possession by a couple of %. But if this was Arsenal playing well (bossing it) how come I hardly remember Friedel having to shot-stop? Szczesny on the other hand? More to the point, if this was Arsenal playing well, how can a Spurs side that hardly asserted themselves still be so comfortable in victory? You could point to Redknapp and claim he started the wrong midfield and that had we played three centrally to combat their three man midfield then Arsenal would not have enjoyed so much time on the ball.

They had efforts. They missed a sitter. They struggled to find cutting edge. We had less time on the ball, failed to dictate tempo but on the counter we were too good for their disorganised defence to handle. When Redknapp made the tactical switch and brought on Sandro it was game over. I’ll wager we’d have won easily if he had started. We’d have suffocated their trio and allowed the likes of Bale to run riot. From the heart of a defensive stronghold there would have been offensive riches to behold. Sandro and Parker in the middle means less of the running back for the more creative of our players.

In an ironic role-reversal, they matched us (we're meant to have the better players, right?) and at the start of the second half bettered us. And yet in the end our quality was superior. The likes of Parker, King and Walker excelling. Defoe worked his socks off. Okay, so Ade was subdued and Modric not as influentially. But Bale was menacing in the second half and Sandro consolidated.

A better Arsenal side with some of those long gone players strutting their stuff would have (might have) punished us. Speaks volumes that we can start the wrong formation and yet still work our way to three points. It’s not that we didn’t play well, it’s just that we should have been set up to be far stronger from the start. We have the depth now. We got away with it because they’re the ones now punching above their weight, trying to play a particular way when lacking the players to do so. We have that little bit more in the way of desire and belief than they do.

When Walker scored, I was obviously euphoric but there was a voice in my head that said, “Well that was expected, wasn’t it?”. What bizarro universe is this that I suddenly find myself living in?

New Spurs. Don’t have to play well to beat Arsenal. I like that.

 

 

Observations:

Was it handball? Top of arm? Apex? I’m going to be completely biased and say it was majestically controlled and not blatantly ‘handball’ in the traditional way. This was hardly a Henry moment. Arsenal should have complained about it with more vigour but they don’t even seem to have that in them these days.

-

Talking of Rafa. He loves giving it to the scum. It's like having a Dutch version of Jenas.

-

Ade. Obviously had a Robbie Keane moment when one on one and thought too much about the moment rather than instinctively scoring then concerning himself about whether to celebrate or not.

-

As for Jack Wilshere and his tweets:

"Van der Vaart should be sent off! He celebrated with the fans? I'm sure that is a yellow?"

“Remember one thing.....Form is temporary and class is permanent!”

Let’s humour him. Rafa did not jump into the stands. If anything the fans moved towards the player. He then moved back. Absolutely nothing to see here other than someone passionately celebrating a goal in a massive game. If Jack was to ever score in a NLD, I look forward to him shaking hands with his team-mates and briskly walking back to the centre-circle.

As for his form/class comment? I’ll remember one thing Jack, your desperation.

-

The vile chanting. The way the media are banging on about it, anybody would think this only ever happens when Spurs play Arsenal.

-

Remember how most of us felt post-transfer window closure? We wanted more than what we got. What we’ve got is four wins out of four with Parker and Adebayor. Probably worthy of another article, so I'll just say sorry. I was (along with a few) proved wrong about Parker. I'm okay with that.

-

12 points. 6 games. Both Manc sides played along with Liverpool and Arsenal. Just Chelsea left. Next nine games look winnable. This being Tottenham it’s the games we should be winning where we end up dropping points. But retaining confidence and positivity...we’re accomplished these days away from home and our form at the Lane remains strong (we don’t lose too many). The season is about to kick off for us.

-

Clive Allen. Knight him.

 

Saturday
Oct012011

Favourites v Underdogs

I've seen quite a few of us referencing the fact we are being perceived as favourites in the North London Derby. That's both the media and the fans believing Spurs have it done and dusted on paper and that it should easily translate on the field of play. I'd agree that our midfield is superior to theirs. I'd also cite the fact their defence plays out to the tune of the Keystone Cops.

They still possess quality (RvP) of the match-winning ilk. But so do we, in abundance, and we are on a roll (three wins on the trot). And we're at home. But then the self-doubt (it never goes away) gently reminds us that we don't tend to do well when expected to do well. We do better when we have less pressure weighing us down. Also, in a NLD, form goes out the window and effort can sometimes match the stronger opposition. Although in our case, that still meant no win against the old enemy for many years. Until recently.

It's almost role reversal this. Arsenal are Tottenham in red and white, whilst Tottenham are the Tottenham we have worked so had to become after 15 years in the wilderness. But still prone to the odd lapse. Major differences? We strengthened in the summer and retained our top players. They lost their top players and signed less than glamorous replacements. You can see why they are regarded as underdogs. They choke more than we do.

Still, there's hardly anything between both sides these days, except perhaps for Wenger and his experience at the very top level and the fact his side have always been at that level, even when others have suggested a 'crisis' or transition.

On paper? We should win. On the field of play? Honestly? I'll be very shocked if Arsenal can show their past seasoned focus and intensity (and desire) considering their form and their fragmented team, punctured with the ordinary and average in amongst the class. I'll be disappointed if we are the ones to choke and allow them to best us. We have the more settled side. They're the ones who stand before us depleted. And yet the positivity is still not embraced.

Teams can always punch above their weight. We've done it many times in the past. Not to dismiss or write off Arsenal, but a pulsating powerful show of strength and unity in our midfield will consume theirs and allow our front-line to punish their back four. My only concern is RvP. Take him out of the equation and it will be the first time in my life-time that my heart will not dance to the beat of nerves. He'll play, which means there are no underdogs or favourites in this game. Not matter how you choose to use paper to prove a point.

There's simply a team that wants it more than the other. I'm obviously going to claim that team is the team in Lilywhite. I hope the players wearing the shirt believe in the shirt as much as we do.

Embrace the positivity. Prove we're the favourites, prove we're the top dogs and let them bask in the indignity as the plucky underdog that tries ever so hard and gets nothing. Life is harsh. We've been at the end of it so many times in the past. It's time to give some of it back.

 

-

Winners of John Crace's 'Vertigo' (original article here): Matt and @betambeau88 - congrats. Email me (use the contact form) your name and address.

 

Saturday
Oct012011

Breaking the fourth wall

One of the things we love about being away on holiday is the feeling of complete detachment from reality back home. That's the whole point of it. Detachment. Escapism. A rest to refresh and rejuvenate and forget about work, bills and the London Underground. Sun it up, party, eat well drink well, sight-see...it's everything but home. The part that hurts is returning. You think in some misconstrued way that whilst you had the time of your life that back home things have somehow moved on when usually nobody actually notices you were gone and nothing has changed. Within a day or two of returning to work, you're back to mundane normality, consumed by routine. What is usually lost as you work yourself back into the routine are some of the moments of clarity you found yourself possessed with whilst swimming around in a pool or drinking an ice cold beer in the hot-tub. Epiphany's a plenty, but only if you remember to pack them in amongst your shorts and t-shirts.

Now by losing them (those moments of clarity), it might be the case that when you're back home the deeply philosophical musings don't hold actual weight back in the real world. So they become instantly worthless whilst you go about doing what you've always done in that oh so comfortable bubble you live in until it's burst next time you book a week abroad.

In my case, I've simply decided that there is not enough honesty and transparency in who I am. To myself. It's probably something that hardly warrants sharing. This is a Spurs blog, I blog about Spurs. But this is my blog and instead of conforming, biting my tongue and generally appeasing part of my audience because I feel obliged to do so - I shouldn't. I'm uncomfortable with it. I require change so my focus is never lost.

This is not to say I spent my holiday thinking about social networking and blogging. I spent time thinking about family life and my past. I guess having this blog allows me to chronicle anything I wish to throw at it, I just don't wish to do so half as often as I should. Reading Vertigo (John Crace) also brought back memories, crashing down on me with hefty reflection. Crace cites his depression and how Tottenham Hotspur was something he still anchored too during his lapses. Some how football transcends. We simply can't turn away from it even when losing ones mind.

Not to delve into too many of the details regarding the holiday, but the main reason we were out in Lanzarote was because my missus sister was getting married there. What with it being a wedding, there was drama. Masses of drama. It changed my opinion on certain people and also gave me perspective parallel to my life that I did not have before. Hence all the deeply philosophical thoughts I had when I wasn't on baby duty.

So what relevance to the Spooky persona and blogging has my week long break birthed? Life story time...

In the five or so years leading up to 2006 I was fighting something I didn't understand or wish to ask others for help on. That was the first problem. I'm naturally not an open person, I don't tend to make very good first impressions and it takes me a while to find that comfort zone to be relaxed and myself. But even then, I probably wouldn't share anything with you that sat outside socialising, music, football etc. I don't open up to family and friends - even best friends - so if there was something wrong, nobody would know. So in those five years I continued this pretence that my head was screwed on when it wasn't. When surrounded by people I knew I could act it out, when alone I had to find things to do to keep me occupied.

Travelling with the Spurs away support and spending hours on message boards were ample distractions in attempting to fool myself and others. I gradually started to slowly slowly detach myself from my closest friends and spent more time clubbing with people I hardly liked because it was an easy way to gain access to drugs. I didn't have a single relationship in this time period leading up to 2006. I'm talking about actual relationships here, because anything with emotion meant grafting. Far easier to just f**k and the internet was a glorious way to meet people with the same mindset. Two or three different people per week, every week (give or take) for almost two years. I'd boast about it if it wasn't so tragically lonely (in hindsight). Sure, it passed the time and populated the hours leaving my head in an unscrewed position, never wanting to notice and no inclination to do anything about it.

With every passing week, I was further away from the person I should have been without the relentless pretence and superficiality.

Friends wondered why I was so distant (I practically lived within 500 meters of three of them), never venturing out. Family had similar concerns. But there I was, smiling and pretending, no one dared to question me. I continued to live in the moment, as two people. The first being the one person people saw at work and around friends/family (when I bothered to make an appearance). The other was equally fake spending money on hotels, powder and pills whilst holding down any remanence of the real me, trapped deep inside with no want to escape.

The façade began to crack. Mainly because I could no longer handle the excess. I had spent near enough 50k (accumulating to almost 100k in the end in amongst other spending) on getting f***ed and being f***ed. Or more to the point, making sure I didn't face it head on. I started becoming resentful of people showing concern. I gave up on the sex because meeting people in hotels and other locations started to drag me down, it felt like too much of an effort and I could no longer stomach the talking.

I stopped going out altogether (other than work which started to become a major struggle) because I couldn't face it. I had no zest or energy to be around anyone. And yet I still found myself at White Hart Lane, probably because I had somehow convinced myself that being there was like being surrounded by people who would not focus on anything but the football. Which was always the case. It was a safe environment. I tricked myself into believing this was proof, the fact I was at the game, that there was nothing wrong with me. Work continued to degrade. The cracks had reached the brickwork and the foundations were about to collapse.

The paranoia leading up to the event in 2006 was unlike anything I had experienced prior. I've been on a dance floor in a club surrounded by gargoyles and followed by black helicopters, but dark and twisted trips on hallucinogenic drugs and the proceeding come down is one thing. This was altogether something completely different. No matter where I was and what I was doing, I felt I was being constantly watched. Not in some clandestine sort of way. Just this unexplainable fear that they knew I was living a lie and that they were waiting for me to implode. I felt I was under constant scrutiny when spoken to, even when walking down the street. Standing in a queue in the post office took monumental effort. Even picking up the phone to talk to someone. Anything where I had to confront other people. All too much to handle.

Those cracks were now becoming obvious to those close to me at work. Easy to hide from friends and family, not so easy when spending eight hours in the office.

I had panic attacks, but brushed over them as just being nervous rather than an ever growing fear. Further embarrassment followed, again, mainly to do with the paranoia and not being able to adapt to simple work tasks. Embarrassment was replaced with anger. I started to lash out (verbally - although I also had fits of rage usually involving punching walls and trashing furniture). At home, I was struggling with sleep more so than ever. Night terrors and sleep paralysis when my eyes did happen to shut, insomnia at all other times. Which meant sitting up all night thinking about it all, attempting to somehow keep up that pretence but unable to do so. I had myself for company and I could not handle it. Gone were all the distractions.

Eventually, I was sent home from work. I don't know what it was I said or did, but it was enough for my manager to ask me  to best take some time out. That weekend, I left home the one time, to go to Upton Park and watch us lose 2-1 to West Ham. I even found time for food poisoning that evening. I was not eating well, so it's laughably ironic that the one time I do I get sick off it. More so considering half our players were equally sick that morning. I returned to work only for things to progressively get worse very quickly. I was given a phone number, asked to call it, then see a doctor and get signed off from work.

That's basically the moment of the event in 2006 that finally had me in that escape hatch ready for launch. Sadly it took a breakdown for me to propel forward. Spent the best part of a year off work, numb on anti-depressants and beta blockers and talking to a psychologist/psychiatrist (I forget his title). I remember one moment during the process of being signed-off when a doctor (he was to assign the case to said psychologist) asked me how I was feeling. A stupendously stupid question if I'm honest. What exactly and how exactly am I meant to react to that? I was obviously f***ed beyond the point of standard sanity, looked like sh*t and he wanted to asses me by asking for my opinion on how I felt? That's the opinion of someone who spent years avoiding the truth, other than the activities that played out to aid that distance between the lie and reality. I told the doctor I was paranoid. He told me I could not possibly be paranoid if I was admitting to being paranoid.

"A truly paranoid person does not claim to be paranoid. They simply believe they are being followed or watched or that someone or something is out to get them".

It was an open invitation to lash out and I did, stating that he was also in on it and that nobody not even someone assigned to help me was willing to help and that he was simply part of the laughing crowd staring at me from the corner of their eye. Or something to that tune. I guess that was enough for him to get the ball rolling on treatment.

The sessions with the psychologist went well. Took a while. The problem when you hide behind a persona created to fool not just others but yourself is that you end up having to lie in order to protect the actual lie. Took a while to break through the various layers.

He told me to continue to follow football and to continue to write and partake in forums. Which I did. This helped because I was then asked to write down how I felt and it was an easier way to convey certain emotions that had been trapped for so long. Even if it (football/forums/blogs) all felt as inconsequential as anything else in my life at the time, although football was a distraction and so was writing about it - and in both instances, the only two things that any sane person would parake in (compared to how I was behaving at all other times).

I continued to cheat actual genuine social participation, face to face. One step at a time. Once I was able to write down my thoughts, I progressed from there and was able to talk up front about them. I continued on the prescribed drugs. I even made a breakthrough outside of the treatment, admitting to my parents (my mother more so than my father) that I was off work. She asked if it was a breakdown, I answered yes and never quite went into any details. She never asked. She was simply there for me. It was enough for me to be around family. It was the first time in a long time I felt I wanted to be and was comfortable in doing so. I continued to work through what was required to get back to normality, whatever that was meant to be.

Eventually I was back at work, healthy and drug-free as well as more adaptable to being around groups of people. Not so much cured, but in more control than I had ever been. Without the compulsive lies and expensive life-style.

I meet my missus soon after. Have an 18 month baby daughter. I'm still a paranoid person, I'm fully aware of that fact. I guess its easier to tag it as having a nervous disposition. If I'm completely and utterly out of my comfort zone and beyond something I can't control I'm still prone to losing it with an additional panic attack cameo. I continue to be a difficult person to get close to, but that was always the case made worse by the difficulties I had. Everyone has some type of sh*t in life they need to overcome and my experiences make me neither unique or special. Just another number in the system.

So why the transparency? Always said I write for therapy and that I do so for myself and hope others will enjoy my sometimes raw, fractured and never perfect musings. During the times when I was locked up inside my own home not wishing to breathe the outside air, I sat sometimes in front of a computer and punched away at the keyboard. Another distraction, but one that helped me in the end. I've never quite presented myself with closure in terms of my online existence. One or two people that know me will read this and will find themselves in the know for the first time. I apologise that talking straight, face to face, is something that's not quite been a possibility as I've always struggled with words if they are not written down. I'm hardly the most articulate in spoken form. And it still remains a struggle, as cited many times, to open up when in person.

So gone are the credit cards, the loose women, the whores, the class a drugs, the hallucinations and insomnia, the crippling paranoia and the rest of the depressive crap. My life is my family and football is my escapism. Music and porn the safe way to escape further if required.

I opened up in the end to the right people that allowed me to fix myself, much like I'm opening up now via this blog. Could not give a f*** about the stigma of admittance in the public domain. I wanted to share this and that's what I've done and don't require patronising or a pat on the back. This is simply for the people who have dedicated as much time reading this blog as I have working on it. That epiphany I had out in the sun was to simply be true to myself and that's something I've almost lost my grip on very recently. Almost. Nothing ground breaking that epiphany, but in practice, it is.

If you've got this far, thank you. John Crace, thank you too.

Anyone who has skipped through it and then rants about the lack of football/transfers/pop-up adverts...the back button should be up in the top left hand corner of your browser.

 

Page 1 2