Jellied eels? No thanks
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 at 9:29AM More speculation, this time about the potential re-building of White Hart Lane and who Spurs may have to ground share with. BBC run a news item on 'Inside Sport' last night, and the Mihir Bose 'understands' this with another insightful article on the Beebs football pages.
Firstly, nothing new. Spurs will either move away from WHL for a couple of years while it's rebuilt and ground share or Spurs will remain at the Lane while a brand new stadium is built from scratch. We all knew this, it's obvious that Spurs will either re-develop their current home or move on. What is new in the way of information is that we have apparently we have Tony Winterbottom (who played a role in the development of Arsenal's ground) on board who is looking at how WHL can expand to 52,000. Also, Paul Philips (a project manager, again involved at the Emirates) and Ken Shuttleworth, an architect who is the right-hand man of Norman Foster who worked on Wembley.
All very good. Dream Team in place. All we need now is the decision on whether we stay or go. Don't want out of WHL. I'm a sentimental bastard. If we did move then ground sharing isn't something I'm looking forward too. Have to scoof at the idea of sharing with West Ham United. I can see the police loving that idea. Getting to the ground on match days would probably involve the odd ambush and flare-up. Imagine playing at Upton Park in a 'home' match against Chelsea. That's one three-some I'd gladly say no to. Better still, when WHU play as at Upton Park in our 'home' game and they turn up with 20,000 away fans. Wear your colours for that early kick-off.
Other suggestions have us playing outside of London at Watford or Reading. Don't really approve of that either. And as for the Emirates, no thanks. Even though, of all the potential clubs we could share with that would give us the least amount of trouble in travel. Wembley would have to be the number one choice. But the FA seem reluctant to help out.
Will be interesting to see if the club decide to ask the fans what they would like with regards to having the ground expanded or move to a new location in Enfield. Bose states that Spurs would prefer to remain at the Lane. Hopefully this is the one thing Levy won't let me down on.
Reader Comments (7)
Ground share with West Ham? That's the stupid. Stupid stupid stupid.
52,000 doesn't seem enough. Not saying we would sell out against the likes of Fulham but if we are aiming for the Champions League (not this season) then 60,000 is a better capacity.
And if we don't make CL? But I see the point being made. 60,000 would only be possible if we moved.
We would never allow a ground share. Anywya, doubt very much you lot would enjoy the stay.
No we wouldn't, Royal Gooner.
Would hugely enjoy fucking the place up on our last time there before we move back to WHL though.
Personally think Spurs will move from WHL. Enfield isn't too bad a venue for a new home. Or even a return to their original home. That should appease everyone.
Spurs will move to Wembley.